Measurement, Evaluation, and Learning

Our approach is central to understanding how access to reading glasses changes lives.

Purpose

Measurement is how we test our theory of change.

Vision Action Fund believes a one-time philanthropic investment — in demand generation, policy reform, and market development — can make reading glasses a routine, self-sustaining part of life in low- and middle-income countries. This leads to lasting gains in vision, income, and wellbeing without ongoing reliance on philanthropy. Our approach to measurement, evaluation, and learning is how we hold that belief to account.


Partners and Governments

We support partners and governments to build practical, country-owned approaches to monitoring, evaluation, and learning.


Evidence

We build and share evidence of what works, including: cost-effective delivery channels, demand generation strategies, household-level impacts, and return on investment.


Accountability

We track our progress transparently against our targets, and hold ourselves accountable to funders, partners, and the communities we serve.


We help partners and governments build data systems they own.

Governments and local partners should own eye care data for the long term. Rather than building parallel, donor-facing reporting systems, we help partners design measurement approaches that live inside national health systems and serve country decision-making first. This materializes as intake forms a community health worker can complete in minutes, dashboards a county records office can pull from directly, and training that treats data collection as part of service delivery instead of an add-on.

Across our portfolio, partners track six categories of metrics.

01. Activation

Government approvals, protocols, and materials in place to launch screening and distribution.

02.
Training

Health workers, pharmacy staff, and NGO teams equipped to screen for near-vision loss and dispense glasses.

03.
Demand Generation

Awareness activities that teach communities near-vision loss is common and correctable, and where they can be screened and fitted for glasses.

04.
Screening and Distribution

People screened, glasses dispensed by channel, first-time wearers reached, and referrals made for additional care.

05.
Unit Economics

The all-in cost to deliver one pair of glasses from factory to face, and how that cost is covered. Tracked by channel — cost per pair delivered, price paid by the end consumer, or willingness to pay — and the share of cost borne by the consumer, government co-financing, and philanthropy.

06.
Livelihood Impact

The change in a person's earning power as a result of near vision correction via income and productivity gains at work, plus the broader quality-of-life benefits that follow.

Kenya

From a health worker’s phone to the national health system.

Community health promoters record screening and distribution data on their phones using a single shared digital tool. That data flows into a live dashboard reviewed jointly by counties, the Council of Governors, and implementing partners, and is reported into KHIS, Kenya's national health information system. Review happens inside routines that already exist — weekly with supervisors, monthly at facilities, and quarterly at county eye health meetings.

Learning what works. Sharing what we learn.

Near-vision loss affects 1.8 billion people, and a pair of reading glasses can be manufactured for under $1 — yet more than 800 million people in low- and middle-income countries still go without. We wanted to know why, and what it would take to close that gap at scale.

Our learning agenda is organized around six questions.

Each draws on partner dashboards, randomized controlled trials, behavioral research, and long-term consumer studies. We openly share what we learn, including results that surprise us — because a maturing evidence base benefits all funders, governments, and organizations working on near-vision loss.

Questions about our measurement approach? Contact us.

Research and Evidence

Help us end this solvable problem.